Sarapoa Republic Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzman and others
Keywords:
Political rights, disciplinary action, due process, non bis in idem, conventionality controlAbstract
After a transitional justice process, different guerrilla groups located in the State of Sarapoa abandoned the fight and merged to the civil life. As part of the peace talks, the government allowed political participation to former members of the guerrilla, through a political party called “Propuestas por la Paz”, which elected Aura Bonilla as Congresswoman and Elizabeth Guzmán as the mayor of the capital. Overthrowing and subsequent inability of both women, made by the state ́s General Solicitor, antagonize with the most basic standards on political rights and restricts the cornerstone of the due process of law: the double jeopardy clause. The following lawsuit approaches the problem through the case law of the Inter-American Human Rights Court, taking special care of the institutional design of the State of Sarapoa, and the establishing the international responsibility for it.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2023-03-22
How to Cite
Zapata, I. D., & Guillén Ruiz, L. (2023). Sarapoa Republic Vs. Juana Elizabeth Guzman and others. Criterio Jurídico, 15(1), 7–47. Retrieved from https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/732
Issue
Section
Artículos de investigación original
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.