Pensamiento Psicológico meets the ethical norms of the Declaration of Helsinki 1975 and its further revisions, therefore, manuscripts must include an explanation of the ethical procedures followed in research. These include:

  • The existence of an informed consent and any other document that responds to the ethical orientation that guide the research in the country in which the research took place and according to international guidelines
  • Declaration of approval by ethics committees of the funding or executing institution (if applicable, registration number)
  • Privacy and confidentiality of participants
  • Manage and processing of data
  • Compliance of the specific laws of the country where the research was carried out
  • For studies carried out in Colombia, the ethical guidelines must be in line with Resolution 8430 of 1993 of the National Ministry of Health.

These guidelines must be set out in the Method section of the article.

On its behalf, the editorial team of Pensamiento Psicológico is committed to the revision of all ethical considerations under the responsibility of the different roles participating in the editorial process, so that all parties follow the rules of scientific publishing.

Regarding authors:

  • Conflict of interest
  • Authorship dispute
  • Transfer of author rights
  • Responsibility and confidentiality of data
  • Investigation fraud
  • Parcial or total plagiarism
  • Ethical research with animals

Regarding peer reviewers:

  • Inhability or conflict of interest
  • Carry out the review process of manuscripts according to the journal's guidelines
  • Transparency in the review of manuscripts and follow up of process
  • Double–blind review
  • Confidentiality in the review process

Regarding the editorial team:

  • Guarantee corrections after publication
  • Keep a rapid and clear communication with authors in the process of review and publication, as well as in the editorial process
  • Keep confidentiality of peer reviewers and authors information that guarantee double–blind revision